Sources are stale or contradictory
The assistant may find several versions of a procedure. Without owners, dates and publishing rules, it cannot know which answer applies.
We build company AI assistants and RAG systems with governed sources, citations, roles, evaluations, feedback, monitoring and cloud, hybrid or local options.
RAG retrieves the parts of company knowledge needed for an answer and provides them to the model as context. It does not automatically mean the model is trained on the documents or that every answer is correct.
The design includes knowledge updates, user roles, answer sources, citations, an evaluation set and behaviour when material is incomplete or contradictory. Only then do we select the interface and model.
The first useful scope comes from the real bottleneck, not from a prebuilt package.
The assistant may find several versions of a procedure. Without owners, dates and publishing rules, it cannot know which answer applies.
One shared index without permission filtering can expose information to people who should not have access.
Without a citation or link, the user cannot quickly verify the procedure, figure or surrounding context.
Testing a few convenient questions does not demonstrate quality. The set must include easy, difficult, incomplete and deliberately unanswerable cases.
The first pilot can serve one user group and a limited source set. Source quality and answer criteria matter more than document count.
We identify sources, owners, users, recurring questions and cases that still require an expert.
We organise formats, metadata, versions and content segmentation required for effective retrieval.
We design retrieval, context and answer instructions with a refusal threshold when evidence is insufficient.
An answer can identify the document, section or link so the user can inspect the original material.
We design login and source filtering within the agreed scope, then test access for each role.
We create a question set, scoring method, feedback capture and knowledge-update process for after launch.
Each stage has a decision, an output and a clear reason to move forward.
We collect user groups, common questions, high-risk areas and conditions for a good or unacceptable answer.
We prepare a selected document set, owners, versions and visibility rules.
We test retrieval and answers against the evaluation set, including questions without a valid source.
We verify permissions, collect feedback and expand knowledge only after quality is reviewed.
Cost depends on source count, update method, permissions, citation quality, login integrations and whether the architecture is cloud, hybrid or local.
| Option | Price | Scope | Included |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI opportunity audit | from PLN 900 net / one-off | The typical range is PLN 900–2,500. We review sources, users, questions, access rules and whether RAG is the right solution. |
|
| RAG knowledge assistant | from PLN 8,000 net / implementation | The typical range is PLN 8,000–25,000 for an assistant grounded in agreed sources with answer evaluation and quality controls. |
|
| Care and knowledge updates | from PLN 500 net / month | The existing RAG care threshold. Scope depends on source-change frequency, user count and the required monitoring level. |
|
| Advanced RAG | Custom quote agreed individually | Local or hybrid deployment, multiple repositories, complex roles, SSO integration, high scale or knowledge requiring enhanced controls. |
|
Net prices in PLN. “From” means the smallest sensible first-stage scope. Advanced delivery — including multiple integrations, migrations, custom roles and permissions, local or hybrid environments, high volumes, extended SLAs or business-critical workflows — is quoted individually after discovery or an audit.
The current portfolio confirms AI features working with user materials, not a full organisational RAG implementation with citations, roles and evaluation.
The product confirms learning-material generation from user notes and PDFs. We do not present it as company RAG with role-aware retrieval and citations.
View the documented moduleThe future case will document sources, roles, the evaluation set, scoring method, access tests and limitations confirmed during delivery.
View the current portfolioThe parent offer for audits, chatbots, assistants, documents, agents and automation.
Open resourceA related scope when knowledge work also needs rules, statuses and system actions.
Open resourceThe solution for extraction, classification, validation and document data flows.
Open resourceClear answers before technology, timing and budget are committed.
Share the document types, user groups, access rules and questions that currently return to experts. We will assess whether RAG fits and how small the first pilot can be.
We design e-commerce stores with catalogue UX, cart, checkout, payments, delivery, order operations, technical SEO and verified integrations.
ExploreWe connect business systems through APIs, webhooks and controlled data flows across CRM, ERP, commerce, panels, imports, logs, retries and monitoring.
ExploreWe design AI agents for defined tasks with scoped data, tools, rules, approvals, logs, exception handling and a safe human fallback.
Explore